by
frowningstreet
@ 2005-12-01 - 09:33:16
Ok, so who is responsible for the sad execution of Mr Menenzes?
The way I see it, is that Sir Ian Blair should carry at least part of the blame, for not announcing to the public that he had authorised a shoot-to-kill policy, and the use of lethal force.
If this had been known, when the police shout 'armed police, STOP', I think most members of the public will stop. Otherwise, a lot of people will probably decide to keep running. As Mr Menenzes did.
I am sure that had he known shoot-to-kill was in force then he would have stopped.
The worst he would have expected would have been being shot in the leg.
Certainly not having his brain stem disconnected. (That btw is what shoot-to-kill means : disconnect the brain from the body)
What about the behaviour of the officers on the street? Frankly, I think they just did their job, obeyed their commanders, and acted in exactly the way they should have done.
In retrospect it was a mistake. But before the event, they acted perfectly. You cannot use hindsight to judge people. I would hope that they would do the same again.
I would also hope that the public is properly educated when the police are operating a shoot-to-kill policy.
But did Sir Ian communicate this even to Tony Blair ?
If he did, then some blame must rest with Tony -- for not insisting on publicising the policy.
If he didn't, then Sir Ian should carry the whole can (of worms) home and eat it.
Knowing when you are wrong and coming clean is what we expect of our leaders. Not fumbled coverups, and awkward justifications that simply do not add up.
Our leaders should show us true leadership. Even if we don't agree with their policies, then demonstrating true leadership is the most important thing they can do.
Ideally do both.